Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable spec that assumes Claude's competence and is well-organized, scoring top marks on conciseness, actionability, and progressive disclosure. Its only gap is the missing validation/feedback loop around the batch script execution in Step 4.
Suggestions
Add a validation checkpoint to Step 4: after running the script, verify {topic}/report.md exists, is non-empty, and spot-check that no [uncertain] values leaked through; if errors occur, fix the script and re-run.
Optionally surface an explicit failure-recovery note (e.g. re-read JSON structure if fields are missing) to convert the batch run into a validate-fix-retry loop and lift workflow clarity to anchor 3.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense, task-specific spec with no concept over-explanation (no padding about what JSON or markdown is); every section prescribes concrete script behavior, fitting the lean anchor 3 rather than the padded anchor 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction skill it provides highly concrete, specific guidance — an exact CATEGORY_MAPPING dict, precise skip conditions, and a TOC format example; per the scoring note, absence of copy-paste code is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (locate dir, scan fields, generate script, execute), but Step 4 runs a batch generation script with no validation or verification checkpoint; the guideline caps workflow clarity at 2 for batch operations lacking feedback loops. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained; the body is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Trigger, Workflow, Output) with no nested references, satisfying the well-organized-sections bar for anchor 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |