Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, well-sequenced workflow skill with strong validation checkpoints, feedback loops, and a clear terminal gate. Its main weakness is density that leaves minor conciseness and progressive-disclosure trim opportunities rather than any structural deficit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence with no concept-explanation padding and every line is directive, but the dense qualification of edge cases ('when X', 'unless Y', 'otherwise Z') offers minor trim opportunities, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an executable store-resolver bash snippet, specific paths ($PRP_DIR/plans/, templates/implementation-report.md), explicit dispositions (FIXED, NOT A FINDING, TRACKED FOLLOW-UP, DECLINED), and concrete handoff invocations; minor gaps remain in copy-paste-ready coverage for the correction modes. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (Establish context through Verify and hand off) with explicit validation checkpoints ('After each coherent task, ask: How do I prove this actually works?'), feedback loops (validate -> fix -> rerun), BLOCKED states, and a terminal 'VALIDATION: GREEN/FAILED' gate. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into numbered sections with a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference (templates/implementation-report.md in Resources) and no nested references; held at 4 because the dense inline process content could arguably be split further and no bundle files exist to verify structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |