Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable planning workflow with strong validation checkpoints and a clear progressive-disclosure spine. It is slightly redundant across the reasoning and verification sections and ships references to three template/workflow files that are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Tighten the overlap between §4 (invariant/primitive reasoning), §7, and the §8 verification checklist so each point appears once; the checklist can reference §4 instead of restating it.
Add the missing bundle files referenced by the body (templates/plan-template.md, templates/report-format.md, workflows/update-references.md) or remove the references, since three of seven pointed-to paths currently resolve to nothing.
Inline a minimal plan-template skeleton (or move it into an existing references file) so the decisive artifact format is reachable without the absent template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, directive, and assumes Claude's intelligence (e.g. 'Plan only. Do not implement, commit, or open a PR.'), with no padding explaining known concepts, but invariant/primitive reasoning recurs across §4, §7, and the §8 checklist and could be tightened. Fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste executable bash (the PRP store resolver), named delegation agents, exact metadata format ('<!-- prp-plan-id: <plan-id> -->'), and a concrete file:line evidence spec, but defers the decisive plan artifact structure to templates that are not in the bundle, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered §1–§8 sequence includes an explicit design gate (§6 stop-and-ask conditions), a 14-item verification checklist (§8), and an error feedback loop for issue publication ('If publication or verification fails, preserve the local plan but report the publication blocker'), matching the anchor for explicit validation steps with checklists and recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-signaled overview pointing one level deep to references and templates with a Resources section, and the four references/*.md files exist in the bundle. However templates/plan-template.md, templates/report-format.md, and workflows/update-references.md are referenced but missing from the bundle, a navigation defect beyond a truly minor gap but not severe enough to drop to the 3 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |