Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction skill that gives concrete per-stage rules and explicit verification steps with strong idempotency guardrails. The only minor gap is that the post-edit re-read verification does not spell out the recovery loop when the re-read mismatches.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery step in 'Verify and report' (e.g. 'If the re-read does not match the requested stage, fix the row and re-verify before returning') to lift workflow_clarity to 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding; it never explains what a PRD/PRP is and every line (guardrails, stage rules, verification) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance per stage (require file existence, record absolute paths in named columns, verify the PR via GitHub, set Status to specific values); absence of code is appropriate for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Resolve -> Apply -> Verify sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('Stop if the phase is missing, duplicated...', 'Re-read the exact phase row after editing'), but the error-recovery path after a failed re-read is only implied rather than stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, with three well-organized sections that keep navigation trivial. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |