Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight delegating overview that gives concrete, executable guidance for setup and clear handoff to the detailed workflow. It is well-structured, though core actionability and checkpoints rely on external files that are not bundled.
Suggestions
Confirm the referenced workflows/agents.md and templates/review-report.md are bundled or otherwise reachable, since the body's actionability and workflow checkpoints depend entirely on them.
Consider merging the inline file references with the Resources section to remove the small duplication.
Surface at least the top-level validation/verification checkpoint inline (e.g. 'run repo validation, then verify corrections before reporting') so the feedback loop is visible without opening agents.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with a compact directive plus an executable resolver script; the only redundancy is the Resources section restating the two files already named inline. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready bash store resolver and concrete execution directives, but the bulk of the review workflow is delegated to workflows/agents.md, which is not bundled here. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear top-level sequence (resolve store → execute agents.md → produce report per template) with validation and correction-verification explicitly part of the delegated workflow, so no destructive-operation cap applies; the actual checkpoints live in the referenced file rather than inline. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview pointing to two well-signaled, one-level-deep references with a Resources navigation section; the referenced files are not present in the bundle, which slightly limits verifiable structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |