prp-review
Reviews GitHub pull requests through specialist review agents, runs repository validation, verifies corrections, aggregates findings, and posts the result. Scales reviewers to risk by default (code review alone for small or mechanical changes; code, seam, and simplification review for contracts, state, and security); the operator can add scopes or explicitly request only selected scopes. Use when the operator asks to review a PR, re-review fixes, check whether a PR is ready to merge, run review agents, or invokes $prp-review.
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The workflow reads pull request titles, bodies, and comments via `gh pr view` and `gh pr list`, which are authored by outsiders on GitHub.
- Repository
Wirasm/prp
- Revision
4352925
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.