Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-organized reference with exemplary copy-paste JSON, explicit gotchas, and a useful mistakes table. Its main weaknesses are mild redundancy in the bundle section and the absence of any progressive-disclosure layer — the full steps API lives inline in SKILL.md rather than in a references/ file — plus a missing error-recovery loop in the testing workflow.
Suggestions
Move the exhaustive Steps Reference and Resource References tables into a references/steps.md (and references/resources.md), keeping SKILL.md as an overview with well-signaled one-level-deep links — the ~200 lines of API detail are the main progressive-disclosure gap.
Add a fix-and-retry feedback loop to the testing section (e.g., what to do when `run-blueprint` fails: read the failing step, check it against the Common Mistakes table, re-run) to lift workflow clarity.
De-duplicate the bundle section — the `zip -r my-plugin.zip my-plugin/` command appears in both "Bundle Structure" and "Creating a Bundle Step by Step" — and move the enumerated PHP version list to a note deferring to the schema to avoid time-sensitive drift.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — e.g., "Every step requires `\"step\": \"<name>\"`" with no tutorializing — and gotchas are stated tersely ("You must `require '/wordpress/wp-load.php';`"). Not a 5 because the bundle section repeats the same `zip -r my-plugin.zip my-plugin/` command twice and the enumerated PHP version list ("7.4" through "8.5") is time-sensitive content not in a deprecated section, though the "Check the schema" caveat softens it. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step ships copy-paste-ready JSON (e.g., the full `installPlugin`/`pluginData` example and the `writeFiles` `literal:directory` tree), plus executable CLI commands (`npx @wp-playground/cli run-blueprint --blueprint=...`) and a Common Mistakes table pairing each error with its correct form. The common cases are fully covered with runnable examples. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clear and concrete: "Creating a Bundle Step by Step" (1–4) and the testing section's explicit checkpoint "Headless validation (runs blueprint and exits)" with both server and run-blueprint commands. Not a 5 because there is no fix-and-retry feedback loop — the closest is the gotcha that a missing `--blueprint-may-read-adjacent-files` fails with "File not found", but no guidance on interpreting and iterating on validation failures. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and external navigation is clear ("For the complete API, see" the docs and schema URLs), but no local bundle files exist and roughly 200 lines of step/resource API reference are inlined in SKILL.md — anchor 3 ("content that could be in a separate file is inline") fits better than 4, since the rubric requires scoring against the actual (empty) bundle structure. It is not a 2 because the inline reference is well-sectioned and external references are clearly signaled rather than buried. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |