Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured routing skill: lean sections, an executable triage entry point, a real one-level reference for the decision tree, and verification/guardrail checkpoints. It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and keeps navigation shallow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no WordPress concept primers, just a triage command, classification cues, routing pointer, and guardrails; every section earns its place rather than the score-2 'could be tightened' or score-1 padded anchors. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides an executable command ('node skills/wp-project-triage/scripts/detect_wp_project.mjs'), specific files to inspect on failure (composer.json, package.json, style.css, block.json, theme.json, wp-content/), and a real routing reference, matching the executable/copy-paste-ready anchor rather than the score-2 pseudocode example. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Procedure (triage → classify → route → guardrails) is clearly sequenced and paired with a Verification feedback loop ('Re-run the triage script if you create or restructure significant files', run recommended lint/test/build), matching the explicit-checkpoint/feedback-loop anchor rather than the score-2 listed-but-no-checkpoints example. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that delegates the routing detail to one clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference ('For the decision tree, read: skills/wordpress-router/references/decision-tree.md', verified to exist), matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor rather than the monolithic or nested-reference lower anchors. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |