Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and concise, with executable commands, a full parameter reference, a clear time-strategy decision flow, and an output-injection workflow including no-hit handling. It could add a second worked example and explicit validation phrasing to reach top marks.
Suggestions
Add a second copy-paste example demonstrating --at plus --window-minutes for the 'only a moment is given' case.
Make the no-hit feedback loop more explicit as a validation checkpoint (e.g., 'Verify HISTORY_CONTEXT_BLOCK is non-empty; if empty, broaden window/keywords and retry').
Consider trimming the Windows parenthetical into a short note plus a one-line command to reduce token weight while preserving the guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and free of concept explanations Claude already knows; the long Windows-path parenthetical is necessary actionable detail rather than padding, with only minor instances that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready bash command plus a complete parameter reference table; minor gaps such as no worked example for --at/--window-minutes keep it just below fully comprehensive. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 时间策略 section gives a clear 4-step decision sequence and the 输出与上下文注入 section adds a post-retrieval workflow with a no-hit feedback path; the operation is read-only so the destructive cap does not apply, but checkpoints are decision rules rather than explicit validation steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with the actual logic appropriately split into scripts/search_history.py and referenced by path; no nested references, with only minor organization gaps keeping it from a perfect score. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |