Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-crafted, lean operational guide: concrete audit and fix steps, an explicit acceptance checkpoint, and genuinely non-obvious pitfalls. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids concept-padding throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational — tables, numbered steps, and a pitfalls section — with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section (核心原则, 操作流程, 常见陷阱) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete audit checklists ('每个配置项在源码配置文件中是否存在？默认值是否与源码一致？'), a fix-type table, and real examples (e.g. 'agent/skills' → 'workspace/agent/skills/', '60秒' vs '3600'); as an instruction-only skill the absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 0–5 sequence (范围 → 清点配对 → 提取源码事实 → 逐文件审计 → 修复 → 验收) culminates in an explicit 验收 validation checkpoint with a checklist, satisfying the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps and checklists' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a single self-contained file with no bundle references, well-sectioned into labeled parts with no nested or dead-end references, so the well-organized structure alone warrants a top score for this scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |