Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and correctly assumes Claude's competence, with a useful inventory of environment tools. Its weakness is instructional depth: there is no worked decision procedure for the advertised cost-benefit analysis, no example tool usage, and the bundled script declared in frontmatter is completely undocumented in the body.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example of the decision procedure, e.g. "Compare wage from find_job() against price/quantity from get_all_products(); buy only when consumption value exceeds cost; record the decision with its reasoning".
Document the script mode in the body: what scripts/economic_reasoning.py does, how to invoke it, and what its outputs (economic_reasoning.json/.txt) mean.
Include one or two concrete example invocations of the environment tools so the agent knows the expected call patterns and return data.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body is lean: three numbered capability bullets, three activation conditions, and a tight tool-signature list with one-word descriptions. No concept explanations Claude already knows; the only near-redundancy is the one-line intro echoing the description, which is minor. Every token earns its place — anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The tool signatures ("get_person(agent_id)", "buy_product(agent_id, product_name, quantity)") are concrete, but there are no example invocations and no procedure for the promised "cost-benefit analysis" — how to actually decide between working and buying is left unstated. This matches anchor 3 (some concrete guidance but incomplete); above anchor 2 because real API signatures exceed high-level hints, below anchor 4 because no executable workflow or example is given. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "What It Does" lists a rough capability sequence (analyze state, evaluate opportunities, record decisions) but there are no explicit steps, checkpoints, or ordering. Additionally, the frontmatter-declared script (scripts/economic_reasoning.py) is never referenced in the body, so the script-mode workflow is undocumented. No destructive or batch operations, so no cap applies; anchor 3 (steps listed, checkpoints missing or implicit). | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short (<50 lines) and well-organized into clear sections, which alone could merit a 5 for a self-contained skill. However, the bundle contains scripts/economic_reasoning.py referenced only via frontmatter — the body never mentions it, its usage, or its outputs — a minor organization gap against the actual bundle structure, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |