Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable guide with concrete schemas, clear multi-step workflows, and explicit error-handling checkpoints. Its main weakness is some conceptual padding around dual-process theory that could be trimmed for token efficiency.
Suggestions
Trim the System 1/System 2 psychological exposition to its operational triggers and outputs, dropping the explanatory prose Claude already knows.
Add one explicit worked example of composing a codegen instruction from an intention to close the actionability gap.
Consolidate the overlapping interrupt/adjustment sections (Need-Driven Plan Adjustment vs Plan Interruption) to reduce redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly compact with tight tables and JSON snippets, but the dual-process (System 1/2) and habit-formation framing spends tokens on conceptual psychology Claude already understands rather than purely operational guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete JSON schemas for plan_state.json and codegen calls plus explicit file paths give mostly executable guidance, with only minor gaps around how the codegen instruction text is actually composed. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequenced workflows (Multi-Step Plans, Resume Logic, Re-observation) include explicit validation checkpoints — checking codegen status, one-retry correction, and a 3-failure threshold — leaving only minor validation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single well-sectioned file with no nested references and clear headers, organized for easy navigation; it is somewhat dense but appropriately self-contained. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |