Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly written, highly actionable operational guide with an explicit multi-step workflow, safety validation, and error-recovery feedback loops; only minor conciseness and progressive-disclosure refinements would raise it further.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated forced-complement-on guidance into a single authoritative statement to trim redundancy.
Consider moving the 设备控制指导 device-specific cases and/or the 异常处理 table into a reference file with a one-level-deep pointer from the main workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence with no basic-concept padding, but a few points (e.g., the forced-complement-on rule) are restated across step 4.3, an example, and key rule #3, leaving minor trim opportunities short of anchor-5 leanness. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands throughout — `device control <did> --set ...`, `device props`, `device action` — with correct/incorrect tables and copy-paste-ready examples covering the common cases, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced six-step pipeline stated upfront, with explicit validation checkpoints (拿不准按复数处理、禁止编造 did、device refresh 重试), a safety 二次确认 two-round dispatch, an exception-handling feedback table, and a 关键规则 checklist — anchor 5 despite being a batch/safety-critical skill because validation is present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear section headers and easy navigation, and no external bundle files to reference; however the device-specific guidance and exception table could arguably be split out, leaving minor organization gaps short of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |