Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, actionable operational guide with real CLI commands, a worked example, and a clear decision table. Its main weakness is the absence of validation/feedback steps for the destructive, batch-capable profile-write operation, which caps workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and operational — a one-line purpose, three terse steps, a compact decision table, and a single worked command, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation or text that could be tightened; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides real executable commands (`miloco-cli home-profile list --target both`, `profile-write --ops '[...]'`) and a complete, copy-paste-ready ops JSON example with a realistic entry. The decision table maps each relationship to concrete ops with required fields; not 2 because it is executable code rather than pseudocode, though only the `add` op is fully exemplified. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (list → analyze relationship → profile-write) with a decision table and a conservative-skip guard for unresolved conflicts. Not 1 because the sequence and decision logic are explicit; not 3 because there is no validation/verification step or error-recovery feedback loop after the destructive, batch-capable `profile-write` (which auto-deletes candidates), and the guidelines cap such workflows at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At ~43 lines with no bundle files and no external references, the skill is organized into clear sections (执行步骤, 提升决策, 矛盾裁决参考, 注意) with headers and a table. Per the sub-50-line simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections score 3; not 2 because there is no inline bloat to split out and no references to manage. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |