Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An instruction-only skill with outstanding actionability and a genuinely well-sequenced diagnostic/triage workflow, including explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops for batch operations. Its main weakness is conciseness — the routing facts and crop-troubleshooting detail are repeated across sections and could be consolidated.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated enumeration of miloco-perception's four commands (perceive devices/logs/query/clear) into one canonical statement; it currently recurs in the description, 工作方式, 何时激活, and the路由 sub-bullets.
Pull the 11-item adaptive_crop_fallback reason list out of the prose (lines 27-29) into a compact table or a one-level reference; the inline enumeration is the densest block and is explicitly disclaimed as incomplete, which both bloats tokens and risks staleness.
The裁切 troubleshooting tree (in_use/crop_in_use/全局闸, then connected, then reason=) reads as three nested paragraphs — restructuring it as a short decision-table would preserve the diagnostic power at lower token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of generic concept-explanation padding, but several dense paragraphs (the裁切 troubleshooting tree at lines 25-29 and the repeated four-command enumeration of miloco-perception across sections) restate the same routing facts multiple times, which could be tightened without losing accuracy. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: concrete CLI command forms, a complete command block, copy-paste-ready worked examples with realistic {code,message,data} envelopes, and exact field-by-field diagnostic recipes (in_use/is_online/connected/awake/crop_effective decision trees). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 误识→感知须知 flow is a numbered closed-loop with explicit checkpoints (locate did → draft 环境/关注/忽略 → 复述确认 → write → note 下窗生效), and the crop troubleshooting path has a structured diagnostic tree with explicit validation feedback (grep adaptive_crop_fallback, reason= values); validation against unknown dids is spelled out in the校验 table. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers (工作方式, 何时激活, 命令, 校验行为, 流程, 状态字段, 示例) and explicit pointers to out-of-skill surfaces (omni/prompt_builder docstring for the full 11-item fallback list, 网页「设置」, miloco-cli service logs); no bundle files exist, so all content is inline, which is appropriate for the skill size but leaves a couple of dense reference blocks (the fallback-reason enumeration) inlined rather than split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |