Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill: it specifies the exact command, file-naming, branching, and output format with concrete examples, and encodes non-obvious domain rules (merge boundaries, identity handling, discard list). Its only mild gaps are a few trimmable explanatory sentences and the absence of a validate->fix->retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, gives concrete commands and a compact output format, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; the 记录原则 prose is domain-specific (merge/identity/discard rules) and mostly earns its tokens, fitting 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'; not 5 because a few explanatory sentences could still be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives an exact command (`miloco-cli perceive logs --jsonl`), exact file-naming with date format, explicit create-vs-append branching, and concrete copy-paste-ready line examples covering common cases (cooking, working, leaving), matching 'Fully executable; copy-paste ready; specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 4-step sequence with explicit checkpoints (empty/error logs -> exit; all-discardable -> exit; file-exists branch) fits 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'; the destructive/batch cap at 3 does not apply because validation is present, but no validate->fix->retry feedback loop pushes it to 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references needed; it is organized into well-signaled sections (执行步骤, 记录原则, 输出格式), so per the simple-skills scoring note progressive disclosure can score 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |