Mostly efficient procedural guidance without explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the body is lengthy and could be tightened — the Automation Offer Guard and repeated next-step framings restate the same constraints. Not a 1 because it never pads with basic-concept explanation; not a 3 because several passages (automation guard, scope/option lists) are verbose and not every token earns its place.

Highly concrete for an instruction-only skill: explicit caps ('at most 50 accounts', 'cap of 10 at a time', 'up to five concrete candidates'), a defined evidence-deepening order, copy-paste output templates, and a ready automation prompt block with named fields. Not a 2 because guidance is specific and executable, not pseudocode or abstract.

A clearly sequenced five-step workflow (choose mode/scope → bound universe → collect evidence → normalize/score → separate evidence from interpretation) with explicit checkpoints ('do not retrieve deeper evidence until the user selects one', 'stop when the recent story is supported') and a Failure Handling feedback loop. Not a 2 because checkpoints and error recovery are explicit rather than implicit.

The body is an overview that signals one-level-deep references precisely when their detail changes the decision — 'Use references/request-schema.yaml when...' and 'Use references/signal-taxonomy.md when...' — and both files exist in ./references/. Not a 2 because references are clearly signaled, real, and appropriately split rather than inlined.

Lists multiple concrete actions: 'monitor an owner portfolio or watchlist', 'rank accounts needing attention from recent evidence', and 'Produce an evidence-backed account brief or bounded watchlist summary with recommended actions' — not vague or abstract. Not a 2 because it enumerates several specific capabilities rather than naming only a domain and a few actions.

Explicitly answers both: when via the 'Use when the user wants to know...' trigger and what via 'Produce an evidence-backed account brief or bounded watchlist summary with recommended actions'. Not a 2 because both what and when are explicit, not implied.

Uses natural phrasings a sales user would say: 'what changed with one account', 'accounts needing attention', 'monitor an owner portfolio or watchlist'. Not a 2 because it covers common user variations (brief vs. watchlist vs. ranking) rather than a single keyword.

Occupies a clear sales-account-signal niche (account briefs, watchlist summaries, attention ranking) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Not a 2 because the triggers are specific enough to avoid overlap with generic CRM or reporting skills.