Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, lean operational skill: nearly all guidance is expressed as complete executable commands, risky workflows (diagnosis, completion) have explicit ordered checkpoints and validation, and Windows/recipe detail is correctly offloaded to two real, well-signaled reference files. The only weakness is minor redundancy between the Operating Rules and the mode-selection sections, which costs a small amount of token efficiency.
Suggestions
Replace the code block in Operating Rule 3 with a pointer to the 'Workspace-scoped implementation' section to remove the near-duplicate example.
Trim meta-commentary such as "Do not simulate 'always select the first option.'" by folding the intent into the preceding decision-rule list.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with executable commands and rules, assumes Claude's competence, and explains no basic concepts — matching 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. It is not 5 because there is mild redundancy (the Operating Rules code block is repeated nearly verbatim in 'Workspace-scoped implementation', and the anti-pattern note "Do not simulate 'always select the first option'" restates the preceding rules), and not 3 because there is no genuinely unnecessary explanation or padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every section is anchored by copy-paste-ready, complete shell commands covering the common cases (exec with sandbox/approval flags, read-only mode, stdin prompts, --json JSONL streaming, --output-schema structured output, resume, auth). This matches 'Fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'; it is not 4 because no key invocation pattern is left to the reader to assemble. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints and feedback loops: the numbered 'Diagnose Failures' order (verify flags → inspect stderr and `error`/`turn.failed` events → re-run with a smaller reproducible task), the 'Completion Standard' checklist requiring tests, diff review, and reported blockers, and the autonomous prompt's decision rules ending in 'Continue until the task is complete or a concrete blocking error is reached'. This matches the anchor 'Clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery; checklists'; destructive-operation validation is present, so the cap at 3 does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a well-organized overview, and exactly two clearly signaled one-level-deep references ([references/windows.md](references/windows.md) and [references/recipes.md](references/recipes.md)) carry the environment-specific detail; both files exist and their stated scopes match their contents. This matches 'Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; content appropriately split; easy navigation'; there is no inlining of material that belongs in a bundle file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |