Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable orchestration playbook with strong validation checkpoints and feedback loops across all phases. Its one weakness is progressive disclosure: it is a large single-document monolith where the spec template and worktree/review protocols could be offloaded to reference files.
Suggestions
Extract the full Spec document template (the fenced markdown block with frontmatter and [Sn] anchors) into a referenced file like references/spec-template.md, keeping only the field summary inline in SKILL.md.
Move the detailed Workspace worktree procedure and the Finish 'worktree pitfalls' appendix into references/worktree.md, leaving a concise default-and-edge-case pointer in the body.
Consider references/review-protocol.md for the Review section's reviewer handoff checklist and the three required review conclusions, to shrink the body toward an overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and directive throughout, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., what a worktree or a failing test is); length reflects a genuinely multi-phase process rather than padding, and every section assumes competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands throughout ('git rev-parse --git-dir', 'git check-ignore -q', 'git worktree add "$path" -b "$branch"', 'bun ci', 'uv sync --frozen') plus a copy-paste-ready spec document template with frontmatter anchors. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced phase pipeline (Orient → Grill → Spec → Workspace → Implement → Verify → Review → Finalize → Finish) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops — 'write a failing test, confirm it fails for the intended reason... confirm it passes', 'After two failed fixes, stop patching', and consent gates for destructive actions. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear headers with no nested references, but everything lives in one inline document — the full spec template, the worktree procedure, and the review protocol are content that could be split into one-level-deep reference files; no bundle files are provided. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |