Use for data-first company, contact, lead, and prospect discovery or enrichment, including firmographic or technographic completion, named-company profiling, entity resolution, ICP matching, prospect-list building, segmentation, trigger or sales-signal analysis, market and territory scans, and enrichment-backed comparisons. Exclude meeting preparation, outreach-led company research, and prioritization of an already established account book.
76
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Whenever this skill asks for context, strongly prefer using the answers-ask-user-input skill and the ask_user_input tool over other tools such as request_user_input; otherwise ask directly in the conversation.
Prepare a sales person with a trusted, decision-ready view of companies or contacts: what is known, what is a strong match, what is still uncertain, and what action the data supports. This skill owns evidence resolution, ICP-fit and coverage comparisons, and source-grounded signal analysis; it does not own rep-work priority, outreach execution, or CRM writes.
MANDATORY: If not already in context, read and adhere closely to plugins/sales/skills/index/SKILL.md## Cross-Skill Best Practices.
Use this priority order when the request is broad or the working set is ambiguous.
Do not silently broaden a supplied list into discovery, merge ambiguous entities, or rank by a criterion the user cannot inspect.
If the user asks to score or tier a list, keep the judgment limited to ICP fit, enrichment completeness, identity confidence, or defined signal strength. If the user asks which accounts to work now, where to focus, or what rep action deserves priority, route to prioritize-accounts.
These are particularly important for this workflow; use your best judgment to potentially include other data sources to improve quality.
Start with the category that owns the requested fields, then attempt only additional categories that materially improve coverage, identity confidence, or the decision. If a material category is unavailable, stale, conflicting, or provider-limited, state the limitation and its impact on coverage or confidence.
These enrichment-specific steps modify the corresponding default workflow stages in the index skill. Continue the remaining default stages, including the first output and proposed next steps.
ask_user_input(); otherwise ask one narrow text question.zoominfo before provider-specific search, enrichment, intent, similarity, or recovery. When it is Apollo, load apollo; apply Apollo v2-specific guidance only after verifying app version 2 or later.Inference:. Never invent emails, phones, titles, technologies, funding, hiring signals, intent, or missing fields.Every mode must include a compact ## Sources & Coverage section before proposed next steps:
After the first output, offer the most relevant follow-up from the options below. Offer one clear transition, not a menu. Suggest ONLY these unless you are very confident another option is more useful:
Next steps to avoid:
# Enrichment Results
| Input Record | Resolved Entity | [Requested Field] | [Requested Field] | Confidence / Notes | Missing Or Unresolved |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Original input] | [Matched company/contact + source link] | [Grounded value + source link] | [Grounded value + source link] | [High/Medium/Low + reason] | [Gap or ambiguity] |
## Key Readout
- [Most useful pattern or implication]
- [Important source gap, duplicate, or weak match]
- [Recommended next check or action]
---
{Follow the instructions and output format/conditions in [Limitations and Improvements](../index/SKILL.md#limitations-and-improvements)}
{Follow the instructions and output format/conditions in [Next Steps](../index/SKILL.md#4-next-steps)}# Qualified Matches
| Company / Contact | Why It Fits | Key Evidence | Confidence | Source |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Entity] | [Hard criteria satisfied] | [Compact grounded evidence] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Clickable link] |
## Near Matches
- [Entity] — [Why it is close but not qualified]
## Gaps / Caveats
- [Coverage, provider, identity, or source limitation]
---
{Follow the instructions and output format/conditions in [Limitations and Improvements](../index/SKILL.md#limitations-and-improvements)}
{Follow the instructions and output format/conditions in [Next Steps](../index/SKILL.md#4-next-steps)}# [Comparison / Segmentation / Signal Scan]
| Entity | [Comparison Field Or Tier] | Evidence / Signal | Confidence | Source | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Entity] | [Grounded value or visible tier] | [Observed signal or rationale] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Clickable link] | [Gap or caveat] |
## What Is Still Unclear
- [Missing field, unsupported ranking input, or next verification step]
---
{Follow the instructions and output format/conditions in [Limitations and Improvements](../index/SKILL.md#limitations-and-improvements)}
{Follow the instructions and output format/conditions in [Next Steps](../index/SKILL.md#4-next-steps)}If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.