Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow skill with clear sequencing and verification gates and no basic-concept padding. The main gap is progressive disclosure: most detail lives inline in one file rather than being split into referenced materials.
Suggestions
Move the three per-mode output templates into a bundled reference file (e.g. references/output-templates.md) and link to it from each mode, keeping SKILL.md as a tighter overview.
Dedupe the source-ownership rules that recur across Key Dependency Categories, Overall Rules, and the Output Contract to tighten conciseness.
If a references/ bundle is added, list it so the progressive-disclosure structure is verifiable against actual files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and domain-specific without explaining concepts Claude already knows (no primer on what a CRM or ICP is); it assumes competence throughout, though source-ownership rules recur mildly across sections. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance: a 6-step ranking priority, provider-specific load rules (load `zoominfo`/`apollo` based on selected provider), explicit hard-filter verification, and copy-ready output table templates per mode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflow stages are numbered (Clarify/Gather, First Draft) with checkpoints ("make at most two narrow source calls...then ask the user to choose") and verification gates ("Verify hard filters before calling a row qualified"); the skill is read/discovery-only so the destructive-write cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to the shared index skill are one level deep and well-signaled, but the body is a single >50-line file holding all detailed material (ranking, dependency categories, three mode templates) inline rather than split into reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |