CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

find-key-internal-sources

Use when a seller needs to find the best internal experts, owners, approvers, documents, channels, source-of-truth materials, or escalation routes for a customer question, product topic, competitive objection, implementation issue, account task, or other sales-support need. Route questions such as 'who knows about this?', 'what should I read?', 'where is the source of truth?', and 'which internal channel or document should I use?' here.

74

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable instruction-only skill with clear sequenced workflow and properly tiered references. Its only weakness is mild redundancy in the reference-loading and bounded-search guidance, which keeps conciseness from the top anchor.

Suggestions

Consolidate the reference-loading guidance: state the 'Use references/search-patterns.md when ...' and 'company-context.md only after the generic pass' rules once, and have step 3 link back rather than restate them.

Dedupe the bounded-search constraints (e.g., the one-attempt / one-fallback / one-fetch caps appear across 'Search canonical sources first' and 'Pull, score, and rank') into a single stated default so quick/deep differ only by count.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is largely instruction-dense with little concept padding, but reference-loading guidance repeats (a dedicated 'Reference Loading' section and again in step 3) and bounded-search constraints recur across steps, so it could be tightened rather than fully lean.

2 / 3

Actionability

Gives concrete, executable bounds — 'at most three source reads', 'up to five concrete candidates', 'one canonical source attempt', 'cap ... at +0.25', 'last 90 days' — plus a numbered ranking rubric and a full output template; absence of code is not penalized for this instruction-only skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–5 are clearly sequenced with explicit stopping rules ('Stop when a supported route is good enough, results stabilize, or ... low-confidence duplicates'), bounded passes, and a disambiguation checkpoint; the routing phase is read-only so no destructive-validation cap applies.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md owns the main workflow while two real, one-level-deep references (search-patterns.md, company-context.md — verified not to chain further) are surfaced with explicit 'Use ... when' markdown links, matching the clear-overview anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-scoped description: third-person, explicit 'Use when' trigger, concrete capability list, and natural quoted trigger phrases. It cleanly answers what the skill does and when to invoke it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates multiple concrete targets — 'internal experts, owners, approvers, documents, channels, source-of-truth materials, or escalation routes' — matching the multi-action anchor rather than the partial score-2 example.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicit 'Use when a seller needs to find...' trigger answers when, and the enumerated targets answer what, satisfying both halves; not capped at 2 because the trigger clause is present and explicit.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrasings a user would actually say — 'who knows about this?', 'what should I read?', 'where is the source of truth?', 'which internal channel or document should I use?' — giving good coverage.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to 'seller' / 'sales-support need' with domain-specific triggers (customer question, competitive objection, account task), a clear niche unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 2 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.