CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

index

Use this Sales index first for explicit Sales mentions and clear seller workflows: prospecting, lead qualification, account research, monitoring or prioritization, meeting prep, call follow-up, outreach research, deal strategy, pipeline or forecast review, CRM-backed context or data enrichment, internal source finding or sales support, customer quotes or evidence, business cases, competitive briefs, rep coaching, sales company research, and company or contact enrichment. For implicit use require clear seller, prospect, account, opportunity, pipeline, forecast, CRM, or customer-facing sales intent.

67

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/opencode/src/skill/builtin/.bundle/sales/workflows/index/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured index/router with concrete tool guidance and usable output templates, but it front-loads heavy shared policy that belongs in reference files and is written in verbose, hard-to-parse sentences. Workflow sequencing is clear though the Next Steps heading nesting is broken and validation checkpoints are thin.

Suggestions

Move the Category Resolution / Missing Source Resolution / Source authority policy (roughly lines 42-68) into a dedicated reference file (e.g. references/dependency-resolution.md) and keep a short summary with a clearly signaled link in SKILL.md.

Split the long run-on mandates (especially Category Resolution step 4) into short imperative bullets, and drop or compress the redundant 'User Input Modalities' section that restates the example block.

Fix the heading hierarchy so 'Next Steps' is a top-level workflow step ('#### 4. Next Steps') instead of '##### 4' nested under First Output, and give the vendored skills (Salesforce, HubSpot, ZoomInfo, Apollo) explicit reference paths.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most content is genuinely non-obvious policy, but long run-on sentences (e.g. the Category Resolution step 4 tool-registry mandate) and the redundant 'User Input Modalities' section could be tightened. Fits 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than 'noticeably verbose' since most sections earn their place.

3 / 5

Actionability

Names concrete tools and calls (ask_user_input, request_plugin_install(['Salesforce'])), a real reference path, and copy-paste-ready output templates for 'Confidence and Gaps' and Next Steps. Minor gaps: the example block uses thinking-trace pseudocode and several sections stay abstract ('aim for a balance of completeness and speed'), so it does not reach fully-executable anchor 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered default flow (Resolve Dependencies and Clarify -> Gather Context -> First Output -> Next Steps) with timing guidance ('within the first 20s') and a fallback sequence for missing sources. Not anchor 5 because validation checkpoints are absent and '##### 4. Next Steps' is mis-nested as a sub-heading under First Output, blurring the sequence.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The one bundle reference (references/orientation-response.md) exists and is clearly signaled, but ~90 lines of dependency-resolution and elicitation policy are inlined in SKILL.md where a separate reference file would serve. Vendored skills (Salesforce, HubSpot, ZoomInfo, Apollo) are named without paths, so navigation is incomplete — fits 'content that should be separate is inline' rather than 'most content appropriately placed'.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it explicitly defines both explicit and implicit trigger conditions and enumerates a comprehensive, natural set of sales trigger terms. The only weakness is a few broad items ('account research', 'sales support') that slightly raise overlap risk with non-sales skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It enumerates concrete sales workflows — 'prospecting, lead qualification, account research, ... deal strategy, pipeline or forecast review, CRM-backed context or data enrichment, customer quotes or evidence' — a comprehensive capability list. This matches the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions with comprehensive coverage rather than the 'minor gaps' anchor 4.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' (a Sales index covering an explicit workflow list) and the 'when' are both explicit: 'Use this Sales index first for explicit Sales mentions and clear seller workflows' plus the implicit-use rule 'For implicit use require clear seller, prospect, account, opportunity, pipeline, forecast, CRM, or customer-facing sales intent'. Both explicit and implicit trigger conditions are stated with concrete phrases, meeting the anchor-5 bar; anchor 4's 'when could be more explicit' does not apply.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases users would actually say ('meeting prep', 'call follow-up', 'pipeline or forecast review', 'CRM', 'rep coaching') with synonym coverage ('sales company research', 'company or contact enrichment', 'outreach research'). Comprehensive natural-term coverage matches anchor 5.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Triggers are distinctively sales-scoped and the implicit-use guard reduces false triggering, but generic items like 'account research', 'monitoring or prioritization', and 'internal source finding or sales support' carry minor overlap risk with adjacent research/business skills. 'Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' (anchor 4) fits better than anchor 5's 'minimal conflict risk'.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.