Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit dependency gates, and appropriately split one-level-deep references, but it is verbose with restated blocking/non-blocking logic and mixes concrete templates with abstract policy and a pseudocode example.
Suggestions
Consolidate the blocking/non-blocking dependency rules into one authoritative section and reference it elsewhere, instead of restating the logic in Category Resolution, Missing Source Resolution, Source authority, and Workflow Steps.
Replace the pseudocode `{...}` thinking example with a concrete worked example showing actual tool calls and a real Confidence-and-Gaps output to lift actionability.
Tighten the Audience and Language and User Input Modalities sections to operational rules only, removing restated preferences and philosophical user-psychology elaboration.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~153-line body restates the blocking/non-blocking distinction across Category Resolution, Missing Source Resolution, Source authority, and Workflow Steps, and repeats the ask_user_input preference already given in Context-Gathering Intake — mostly efficient domain-specific guidance but could be tightened; not level 1 because it avoids explaining generic concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete output-format templates (Confidence and Gaps, Next Steps), named tools (ask_user_input, request_plugin_install), and numbered steps, but interleaves them with abstract policy ("Aim for a balance of completeness and speed") and a pseudocode thinking example rather than fully copy-paste-ready guidance throughout; level 3 would be consistently executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear four-step sequence (Resolve Dependencies → Gather Context → First Output → Next Steps) with explicit validation gates ("Resolve missing [Blocking] categories before the first output") and a missing-source recovery feedback loop (search registry, recheck, offer install, fallback); not level 2 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference ("Load `references/orientation-response.md` and return its user-facing content as written"), verified to exist as a real bundle file, with orientation content appropriately split out rather than inlined; level 2 would lack clear signaling or keep separable content inline. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |