Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, highly actionable router body with a clear validated workflow sequence and well-signaled one-level-deep sibling-skill references. The only notable gap is a referenced demo asset (assets/demo-product-growth.csv) that does not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Either add the referenced assets/demo-product-growth.csv to the bundle or remove/soften the reference to it so no in-body path dangles.
Consider stating what to do when none of the 13 routing bullets clearly matches (e.g., fall back to the closest workflow or ask for clarification) to close a small routing-edge gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it never explains what a dashboard, KPI, or notebook is, and every line provides routing, ordering, source-access, or output-format guidance that earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete symptom-to-path routing table ('Metric changed... read ../metric-diagnostics/SKILL.md'), a numbered execution order, explicit source-request artifacts, and a per-format output policy — copy-ready and directly executable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence embeds explicit validation checkpoints (step 2 'Validate source quality and metric definitions', step 4 'Validate conclusions') plus a feedback loop ('If available sources conflict... surface the conflict and use the data-quality workflow'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (13 sibling SKILL.md files via 'read ../X/SKILL.md') and well-organized sections, but the body references assets/demo-product-growth.csv which is not present in the bundle — a minor organization gap rather than a structural one. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |