Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, lean routing overview that effectively delegates detail to bundled workflows and references with clear checkpoints. Its main weakness is actionability: several routing steps are directional rather than giving concrete file paths or commands.
Suggestions
Add concrete file paths for the routing steps where feasible (e.g., name the specific workflow SKILL.md files to read for each common sequence instead of only naming the directories).
For the 'smallest suitable implementation' fallback, give one or two concrete host-supported starting points rather than only describing the preference abstractly.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean overview that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining what Product Design or a frontend stack is; every section earns its place with no padding or concept restating. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Routing is concrete ('Read workflows/index/SKILL.md completely', 'Resolve relative links from the file that contains the link') but several steps are directional rather than executable and lack the specific commands/files that the top anchor expects; it stops just short of fully actionable guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered routing sequence is explicit with clear checkpoints ('Read every selected workflow's SKILL.md completely before acting') and gating guards against over-loading unrelated workflows, satisfying the clear-sequence-with-checkpoints anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview that points one level deep to workflows/index/SKILL.md and the real reference files in references/ (communication-protocol.md, critical-overrides.md, existing-codebase-edits.md), with bundled capabilities enumerated for easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |