Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A solid, well-structured tool reference that is highly actionable and free of conceptual filler. Its main gaps are the absence of worked examples for the most common calls and a lifecycle workflow that must be assembled by the reader from separate sections.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example of the most common flow: a yao_daemon_start call with command, description, and port, followed by the port_detecting response and the eventual running status with daemon_url.
Consolidate the redundant port-detection prose: the intro paragraph ('Both modes start by returning port_detecting with daemon_port: 0...') duplicates the two mode bullets; keep only the mode-specific details.
Present the daemon lifecycle as one numbered sequence (start with port → poll yao_daemon_status → use daemon_url from the BackgroundJobReceipt → yao_daemon_restart on crash → yao_daemon_stop when done) instead of distributing it across Tools, Response Fields, and Usage Rules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense, tool-specific reference with no padding about concepts Claude already knows ('All responses are JSON. Daemon objects contain...', param tables, error codes). However, the port-detection intro paragraph ('Both modes start by returning port_detecting with daemon_port: 0...') restates what the two mode bullets immediately re-detail, and the daemon_url field description repeats the port-verification phrasing. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and executable throughout: exact parameter tables with defaults ('limit | 20', 'working_dir | workspace'), enumerated response fields, error codes, and explicit polling instructions ('Poll yao_daemon_status until status changes to running'). Falls short of 5 because there are no worked examples of the most common operations (a start call with command/description/port, or a status response body), only list/stop/error JSON samples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The port-detection flow is clearly sequenced with explicit expected outcomes and failure modes ('with daemon_port: 0 and detail: specified port N not detected within timeout (~60s)'), which is a real validation checkpoint. Not 5 because the overall daemon lifecycle (start → poll status → use daemon_url → stop/restart) is scattered across Tools, Response Fields, and Usage Rules rather than presented as one coherent sequence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Tools, Parameters, Response Fields, Errors, Usage Rules, BackgroundJobReceipt) with a flat, navigable structure and no buried or nested references. It is not 5 because at ~95 lines the full response-field enumeration and the detailed port-detection behavior are candidates for a separate reference file, and the body exceeds the simple-skill threshold where inline-only content would be fully appropriate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |