Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with executable commands and a clear sequenced workflow including a pre-check and fallback. It is concise and well-structured for a simple skill, with only minor redundancy in the Guidelines section.
Suggestions
Make the workflow's validation explicit by labeling the 'secret_list first' check and the 'not found → prompt user' fallback as numbered validation/checkpoint steps.
Trim Guidelines items that restate the description (e.g. 'Never hardcode API keys or tokens') to tighten token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding about what secrets are, but the Guidelines section restates the 'never hardcode' point from the description and includes a couple of slightly obvious items that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (`tai tool secret_list '{}'`, `tai tool secret_read '{"name": "GITHUB_TOKEN"}'`) with a parameter table and concrete examples covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Typical Workflow is clearly sequenced (list → read → use) with a pre-check ('Always call secret_list first') and an error fallback ('If a secret is not found, prompt the user'), but the checkpoints are lightly stated rather than explicit validation steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple under-50-line skill with no need for external references, and it is well-organized into clear sections (tools, workflow, guidelines), so well-organized structure alone earns the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |