Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of a compact two-tool skill: executable commands, a parameter table, a clear three-step workflow with a pre-check and failure handling, and security guidance for handling decrypted values. Nothing is padded, mis-filed, or missing for its scope.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 47-line body is lean and operational throughout: no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, no padding, and every section (tools, parameter table, security note, workflow, guidelines) carries actionable information — matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands ('tai tool secret_list \"{}\"', 'tai tool secret_read \"{\"name\": \"GITHUB_TOKEN\"}\"') plus a parameter table and a concrete failure path ('If a secret is not found, prompt the user to configure it') cover the common cases exactly as the anchor-5 example requires. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, non-destructive, single-purpose skill, and the 'Typical Workflow' section (list, read, use) is unambiguous with a built-in pre-check ('Always call secret_list first to check if a required secret exists') and an explicit not-found recovery path — meeting the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist) and under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no content that belongs in a separate file, which the rubric's guideline scores as 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |