CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

verify

Verify that a change really works before you claim completion

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/verify/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Verify

Use this skill when the user wants confidence that a feature, fix, or refactor actually works.

Goal

Turn vague “it should work” claims into concrete evidence.

Workflow

  1. Identify the exact behavior that must be proven.
  2. Prefer existing tests first.
  3. If coverage is missing, run the narrowest direct verification commands available.
  4. If direct automation is not enough, describe the manual validation steps and gather concrete observable evidence.
  5. Report only what was actually verified.

Verification order

  1. Existing tests
  2. Typecheck / build
  3. Narrow direct command checks
  4. Manual or interactive validation

Rules

  • Do not say a change is complete without evidence.
  • If a check fails, include the failure clearly.
  • If no realistic verification path exists, say that explicitly instead of bluffing.
  • Prefer concise evidence summaries over noisy logs.

Output

  • What was verified
  • Which commands/tests were run
  • What passed
  • What failed or remains unverified
Repository

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode

Path

skills/verify/SKILL.md

Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.