Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, well-structured instruction-only workflow: a clear regression-tests-first procedure with validation gates, a concrete report template, and good single-level organization. Its only real weakness is conciseness — a guidance-alignment section and a duplicated fallback-category list could be trimmed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly dense and actionable, but the "GPT-5.6 Guidance Alignment" section restates general principles Claude already knows ("Keep outputs concise and evidence-dense", "Treat newer user instructions as...") and the fallback categories are listed in both step 3 and step 4, so it could be tightened past level 2. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Though instruction-only with no code, the guidance is concrete and copy-paste ready: specific detection signals ("quick hacks, temporary workaround, swallowed errors"), an exact pass sequence, and a full report template; per the scoring notes absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 1–7 procedure is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — regression tests first, re-run verification after each pass, and a full quality-gates step (regression/lint/typecheck/scan) — matching the level-3 anchor of clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the skill is self-contained; it is organized into clearly signaled single-level sections (When to Use, Procedure, Output Format, Scenario Examples) with no nested references, which qualifies for level 3 per the simple/well-organized-skills note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |