Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill: concrete output template and numbered workflow make it actionable, with clear sequencing and checkpoints, and sensible single-file organization. The main weakness is conciseness — the evidence-vs-inference point and the Quality-bar checklist repeat earlier sections and could be consolidated.
Suggestions
Consolidate the evidence-vs-inference guidance into one authoritative section; the distinction is currently restated in the contract, Evidence rules, Question-aligned synthesis, Working method, Output contract, and Quality bar.
Trim or remove the Quality bar list — its items largely restate rules already specified above (read-only, ranked, confidence, file references, evidence-vs-inference), so it adds tokens without new guidance.
Merge the 'Execution policy' and 'Working method' sections, which overlap on outcome-first reporting and sequencing, to remove redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~140-line body is mostly efficient methodology with no beginner-concept padding, but the evidence-vs-inference distinction is restated in five sections and the 10-item Quality bar repeats points already covered, so it could be tightened; not a 3 because not every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: a 7-step Working method and an Output contract with a literal table template ('| Rank | Explanation | Confidence | Basis |') and 'path/to/file:line-line' examples; for an instruction-only skill this is fully actionable, not merely descriptive. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Working method gives a clear 1–7 sequence with checkpoints (read direct evidence, rank by support, separate evidence from inference, stop condition) and explicit evidence-labeling validation; the task is read-only so the destructive-feedback-loop cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so this is a single-file methodology skill organized into well-signaled sections (Use when / Do not use / contract / evidence rules / working method / output contract); nothing inline obviously belongs in a separate reference, matching the simple-skill allowance for a well-organized single file. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |