Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately terse for a hard-deprecated shim and unambiguously tells Claude not to invoke it while pointing to替代 workflows. Its main weakness is that the redirection names generic workflow categories instead of concrete replacement skills, leaving the redirect slightly soft.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The four-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place, matching the 'Lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete redirection guidance ('Do not invoke or route this skill'; route build failures to 'the active execution, debugging, or verification workflow') but provides no executable code or precise target skill names, fitting 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action (do not invoke; redirect build failures elsewhere) is unambiguous and the simple-skill exception applies, but the redirection names workflow categories rather than specific skills, leaving a minor gap below the fully-explicit anchor (5). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line skill needing no external references, the heading plus clear deprecation notice is well-organized; it stops short of a 5 only because a leftover '{{ARGUMENTS}}' placeholder and lack of explicit routing targets slightly reduce navigational crispness. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |