Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable review card with concrete commands, prompt templates, a deterministic synthesis gate, and a clear exit condition. Its main weakness is repetition of the independence/no-self-review rule, which inflates length without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Consolidate the three restatements of the unavailable-lane / do-not-self-review rule into one canonical paragraph (e.g. in the Synthesis gate) and reference it from Execution step 2 to trim redundancy.
Make the `task()` invocation examples concrete by replacing the illustrative `task(...)` pseudo-syntax with the actual agent-invocation mechanism used (CLI command or tool call) so they are copy-paste ready.
Resolve the `[scope and artifacts]` placeholder with a one-line instruction on how to interpolate the recorded scope into the lane prompts.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean operational directives (git commands, task() prompts, state contract, output template), but the unavailable-lane / do-not-self-review rule is restated three times (Execution step 2, the Synthesis gate, and a standalone paragraph), matching 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'; not 4 because the repetition is more than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It supplies concrete `git status`/`git diff` commands, an `omx state write` JSON payload, exact `task()` prompt templates, and a copy-paste report contract, matching 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'; not 5 because of `[scope and artifacts]` placeholders and illustrative pseudo-invocation syntax rather than a real CLI. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced (Inputs -> Execution -> taxonomy -> state contract -> synthesis gate -> output contract -> exit condition) with a deterministic gate and an exit-condition checklist, matching 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present'; not 5 because error-recovery is delegated outward (rework/ralplan) rather than an explicit in-flow validate-fix-retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Headers organize the card well and the one external reference (`templates/AGENTS.md`) is clearly signaled at one level deep; no bundle files exist and the self-contained single-file form is appropriate, matching 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; references mostly clear'; not 5 because nothing is actually split across files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |