Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete prompts, commands, deterministic gating, and clear workflows, but it is a large monolithic file with some redundancy and no progressive disclosure into bundle references.
Suggestions
Split large inline blocks (review/architect checklists, the output template, the Codex consultation protocol) into separate reference files linked from SKILL.md.
De-duplicate the merge-gating rules and approval criteria, which are restated in both the synthesis step and the Approval Criteria section.
Tighten explanatory passages (e.g., the GPT-5.6 guidance and State/HUD contract) to keep the body lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most content earns its place (executable prompts, commands, templates), but gating rules and checklists are restated across sections and a few passages could be tightened, leaving it mostly efficient rather than fully lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable task() prompts, a concrete omx state command, deterministic merge-gating rules, and a copy-paste output template rather than vague direction or pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence pairs with explicit approval gating and fallback rules for unavailable lanes, giving this merge-readiness gate concrete validation checkpoints and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the skill is a large single-file monolith with no bundle files and no external references, leaving content that could be split (checklists, output template, consultation protocol) inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |