Run a comprehensive code review
56
63%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./plugins/oh-my-codex/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
The required workflow runs independent `code-reviewer` and `architect` tasks over the user’s “Scope: [git diff or specific files]”; this means LLM context will include the contents/diffs of PR changes (outsider-authored when the PR is not authored by the operating user), creating an indirect prompt-injection risk via repository/PR text.
435d4a9
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.