Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body delivers an unusually rigorous, well-gated workflow with concrete commands, payloads, and validation loops, but it pays for that rigor with severe duplication and a monolithic structure. Nearly every governing policy is stated 2-4 times across Execution Policy, the phases, Tool_Usage, and the checklist, and reference material that belongs in separate files is fully inlined.
Suggestions
Deduplicate policies that appear multiple times: state the oversized-context gate, the answers[] contract, the read-only MCP state rule, and the OMX_QUESTION_RETURN_PANE prefix once each instead of repeating them across Execution Policy, Phase 2, Tool_Usage, and the Final Checklist.
Split reference material into references/ files — e.g. references/question-payloads.md (omx question types, payloads, answer shapes), references/handoff-contracts.md (the five Phase-5 execution lanes and stride contract), and references/autoresearch.md — keeping SKILL.md an overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Trim the 40+ bullet Execution Policy section to the handful of governing rules and fold the remainder into the phases where they apply, so the workflow sequence can be read linearly without holding dozens of up-front caveats.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~575-line body restates the same policies repeatedly: the oversized-context summary gate appears in four places, the answers[] contract in four, the read-only MCP state rule in three, and the OMX_QUESTION_RETURN_PANE prefix in three, fitting the anchor for noticeably verbose with several padded sections. It avoids score 1 because it does not explain concepts Claude already knows — the padding is duplicated domain policy, not basic-concept tutorial text. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: exact commands (omx state write --input '<json>' --json, omx quality-gates list --stage deep-interview --json), copy-paste JSON payloads for state, question rounds, and handoff contracts, exact ambiguity formulas with weights, and exact artifact paths with UTC timestamp formats. Minor gaps keep it from a 5: the actual omx question CLI invocation line is never shown (only its payload fields), and steps like the execution contracts assume external ecosystem knowledge ($ultragoal, explore) without complete examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-phase sequence is clearly ordered with per-round ambiguity re-scoring, explicit readiness gates (Non-goals, Decision Boundaries, pressure pass, closure audit), genuine feedback loops (refine the spec then re-run blocking gates; blocked-state persistence; resume procedure), explicit stop conditions, and a final checklist — matching the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation, error-recovery loops, and checklists. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files at all; roughly 200+ lines of reference-grade material (omx question payload/answer-shape contracts, five Phase-5 handoff contracts, autoresearch specialization, TOML config) are inlined in a single 43KB SKILL.md. Internal structure is genuinely present (tagged sections, phases, headers), which places it at "some structure but content that should be separate is inline" rather than the minimal-structure anchor 2, but the monolithic volume and absence of any references/ split keep it below 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |