Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and concrete contract spec; its main gap is the absence of an example showing a filled-in DESIGN.md section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the inline required-sections list is the contract spec itself, not verbosity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | A concrete 5-step workflow, explicit required DESIGN.md sections, specific interview-gap categories, and a completion checklist give mostly executable guidance; a filled-in section example would close the minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly numbered (Discover, Interview, Create/refresh, Apply, Handoff) with an 'Evidence and completion' validation checklist; no destructive/batch ops so the cap is irrelevant, though explicit re-validate feedback loops are light. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one clearly signaled one-level reference (templates/AGENTS.md) and no bundle files; just short of 5 because the section template could optionally live in a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |