Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, executable task card with clear sequencing and built-in safety gates for its destructive remediation steps. Minor gains are available from removing a small redundancy and optionally externalizing the larger bash blocks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean bash with tight classification notes (INFO/WARN/CRITICAL) and no padding of concepts Claude already knows, fitting the score-4 anchor of efficient with minor trim opportunities. It is not a 5 because the AGENTS.md refresh step is restated near the end, a small redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable bash commands across diagnostics, cache inspection, hooks, remediation, and cache pruning, covering the common cases, matching the score-5 anchor. It is not a 4 because the guidance is complete and directly runnable rather than having gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (run diagnostics with flags, classify severities, emit the report contract, remediate gated on user confirmation and OMX-ownership, then rerun `omx doctor` with before/after evidence) is clear with validation checkpoints. It is not a 5 because remediation is presented as options rather than a strict numbered feedback loop and some safeguards (backups) are optional. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into named sections (Run diagnostics, Report contract, Remediation, Exit conditions) with one-level references (templates/AGENTS.md, a WebFetch URL) clearly signaled, fitting the score-4 anchor. It is not a 5 because the diagnostic bash blocks are substantial inline content that, at ~114 lines, could be split into scripts/ for a cleaner overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |