CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tdd

TDD deprecated shim

42

Quality

42%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/tdd/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

TDD deprecated

Hard-deprecated. Do not invoke or route this skill. Keep test-first discipline inside the active implementation workflow and verify with the project test suite.

The Iron Law

NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST

Write code before test? DELETE IT. Start over. No exceptions.

Red-Green-Refactor Cycle

1. RED: Write Failing Test

  • Write test for the NEXT piece of functionality
  • Run test - MUST FAIL
  • If it passes, your test is wrong

2. GREEN: Minimal Implementation

  • Write ONLY enough code to pass the test
  • No extras. No "while I'm here."
  • Run test - MUST PASS

3. REFACTOR: Clean Up

  • Improve code quality
  • Run tests after EVERY change
  • Must stay green

4. REPEAT

  • Next failing test
  • Continue cycle

Enforcement Rules

If You SeeAction
Code written before testSTOP. Delete code. Write test first.
Test passes on first runTest is wrong. Fix it to fail first.
Multiple features in one cycleSTOP. One test, one feature.
Skipping refactorGo back. Clean up before next feature.

Commands

Before each implementation:

# Run the project's test command - should have ONE new failure

After implementation:

# Run the project's test command - new test should pass, all others still pass

Output Format

When guiding TDD:

## TDD Cycle: [Feature Name]

### RED Phase
Test: [test code]
Expected failure: [what error you expect]
Actual: [run result showing failure]

### GREEN Phase
Implementation: [minimal code]
Result: [run result showing pass]

### REFACTOR Phase
Changes: [what was cleaned up]
Result: [tests still pass]

External Model Consultation (Preferred)

The tdd-guide agent SHOULD consult Codex for test strategy validation.

Protocol

  1. Form your OWN test strategy FIRST - Design tests independently
  2. Consult for validation - Cross-check test coverage strategy
  3. Critically evaluate - Never blindly adopt external suggestions
  4. Graceful fallback - Never block if tools unavailable

When to Consult

  • Complex domain logic requiring comprehensive test coverage
  • Edge case identification for critical paths
  • Test architecture for large features
  • Unfamiliar testing patterns

When to Skip

  • Simple unit tests
  • Well-understood testing patterns
  • Time-critical TDD cycles
  • Small, isolated functionality

Tool Usage

Prefer native test-engineer consultation or CLI-backed ask surfaces when available. Optional MCP compatibility ask tools may be used only when already enabled. If consultation tools are unavailable, fall back to the test-engineer agent.

Remember: The discipline IS the value. Shortcuts destroy the benefit.

Repository
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.