Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately concise and well-structured for a tiny deprecation notice, but its guidance is not actionable: it redirects to 'OMX trace/runtime inspection surfaces' without naming them or giving any concrete command. No validation/workflow steps are present, though none are strictly needed for a redirect.
Suggestions
Name the specific maintained OMX surfaces and provide at least one concrete command or entry point so the redirect is actionable instead of vague.
Remove the vestigial 'Task: {{ARGUMENTS}}' line, which adds no value to a hard-deprecated skill.
If a redirect workflow is intended, state it as an explicit step (e.g., '1. Do not invoke this skill. 2. Use <named surface> for trace evidence.') to make the sequence unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean three-line deprecation notice with no concept explanations or padding; every token earns its place, matching the score-3 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It offers only vague direction ('Use maintained OMX trace/runtime inspection surfaces directly') with no concrete commands, code, or named surfaces, fitting the score-1 'describes rather than instructs' anchor. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The redirect intent is stated ('Do not invoke or route this skill…Use maintained OMX…surfaces') but the target is underspecified with no concrete steps, so it sits at score-2 rather than fully unambiguous. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is an under-50-line skill with no need for external references (none exist), and the single heading plus clear statement is adequately organized, so the simple-skills note permits a score-3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |