Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and exceptionally well-sequenced with robust validation for a durable state workflow, but it is monolithic with no progressive disclosure via separate reference files.
Suggestions
Move the large inline quality-gate JSON schema and detailed steering API into separate reference files (e.g., quality-gate.json, STEERING.md) linked one level deep from the body.
Consider extracting the phase/HUD contract details into a reference file to shorten the main SKILL.md overview.
Add bundle files under references/ or scripts/ for reusable artifacts so progressive disclosure has an actual structure to navigate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and assumes Claude's knowledge (no padded explanations of what Codex or goals are); length reflects genuine multi-phase complexity with only minor areas that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: exact shell commands with flags, precise get_goal/create_goal/update_goal call sequences, and a complete copy-paste-ready JSON quality-gate schema. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered sequences (the 11-step complete-goals loop and 7-step final gate) have explicit validation checkpoints, Codex snapshot reconciliation, rerun-after-cleaner feedback loops, and blocked/failed/retry recovery paths. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is reasonable, but no bundle files exist and all detail (the full quality-gate JSON schema, steering API, phase contracts) is inlined in one file rather than split into one-level-deep references. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |