Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exemplary: a lean, novel, fully executable protocol with an explicit round template, dependency-ordered sequencing, and explicit wait/confirm checkpoints. It assumes Claude's intelligence throughout and adds only what Claude could not invent itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | In ~30 lines it defines only novel concepts (design tree, frontier, rounds) that Claude could not derive itself, includes zero padding or explanations of known concepts, and every sentence carries a new operational rule — 'Lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The round-format template ('❓ **Q1** - **<question title>**... ➡️ <your recommended answer>') is copy-paste ready, and the rules are fully executable: ask the whole frontier in one round, number each question with a recommendation, dispatch sub-agents for facts, offer visual-thinking at 3+ open decisions. Nothing is left as vague direction. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step process is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints: ask frontier → 'wait for the user's answers before the next round' → recompute frontier → 'The session is done when the frontier is empty' → 'Do not act on it until the user confirms'. The gating on user answers and final confirmation are exactly the explicit checkpoints the top anchor requires, and no destructive/batch cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines and single-purpose with no bundle files, so per the simple-skill note it qualifies for a 5: the body is cleanly organized (tree model → rounds → format template → tree dynamics → visual-thinking handoff → fact-finding → termination), and the single external mention ('visual-thinking' skill) is clearly signaled as an optional offer, not a buried reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |