Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The router is well-organized and concise, with a clear 5-step protocol and a sensible progressive-disclosure intent. Its main weakness is that the core static-layer files and manifest.yaml it depends on are missing from the bundle, leaving its actionable guidance and verification checklist undeliverable.
Suggestions
Ship the missing core bundle the router depends on — manifest.yaml and the static/ layer (core/principles.md, core/workflow.md, core/output-contract.md) plus nature-shared/terminology-ledger.md — or inline their essential content so every referenced path resolves to a real file.
Inline the pre-response verification checklist (or at least its key checks) in SKILL.md so the workflow has an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop instead of deferring it to an absent file.
Trim the 'Why this split' section, which restates the static/dynamic framing already covered by the routing protocol, to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence (no over-explanation of PDF/DOI concepts), but the 'Why this split' section and the static/dynamic framing partly restate the routing protocol already described above, so it could be tightened; not level 3 because of that redundancy, not level 1 because there is no concept padding. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps are concretely worded ("Read [manifest.yaml]", "Read the file mapped for the detected source_format") but the files they point to — manifest.yaml, static/core/principles.md, core/workflow.md, core/output-contract.md, ../nature-shared/core/terminology-ledger.md — do not exist in the bundle, so the promised executable guidance is missing key details; not level 3 (not copy-paste deliverable) and not level 1 (the steps are specific in form rather than vague). | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence exists with one explicit checkpoint ("State the detected value in one short line... so they can correct you cheaply"), but the pre-response verification checklist is deferred to the absent core/output-contract.md rather than inlined, so the validation/feedback loop for this output-producing operation is missing per the destructive/batch-operations guideline, capping the score at 2 rather than 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The on-demand references that exist (references/figure-extraction.md, output-spec.md, grounding-rules.md, article-anatomy.md) are well-signaled and one level deep, but the core routing targets the body 'always_load's — manifest.yaml and the entire static/ and nature-shared/ layers — are absent from the bundle, so a large share of signaled references resolve to nonexistent files, breaking navigation; not level 3 because of these dead-end references and not level 1 because real, organized structure is present. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |