nature-response
Draft, audit, or revise Nature-style revision correspondence packages: point-by-point reviewer response letters, rebuttal letters, revision cover letters, LaTeX cover/response templates, and red-marked revised-manuscript excerpts. Use for reviewer comments, editor decision letters, pasted editorial emails, response drafts, cover letters, response to reviewers, rebuttal, 修回信, 返修邮件, 编辑邮件, 返修 cover letter, 审稿意见回复, 逐点回复, 大修回复, 小修回复, 回复审稿人, 修改稿回复, 写rebuttal, 回应审稿意见, 标红修改, or LaTeX 模板.
68
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The workflow describes parsing a “pasted journal email” and “reviewer comments” (outsider-authored free text supplied by the operating user) and then extracting and drafting while preserving that wording, which directly feeds that outsider prose into the agent/LLM context; although it is not auto-fetched from the public web, the required runtime path still ingests outsider text provided in the input.
- Repository
- Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
- Commit
703c150
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.