Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill with strong progressive disclosure and clear workflow gating. Main weakness is minor verbosity from overlapping stance/red-lines bullets versus the workflow.
Suggestions
Consolidate 'Default stance' and 'Red lines' bullets that duplicate Workflow steps to reduce token cost without losing constraints.
Add one filled example of a Major Concern block (R1-M1 with claim/evidence pointers populated) to lift actionability to copy-paste ready.
Make the QA failure-recovery loop explicit (e.g., what to fix and re-run when a grounding or isolation check fails) to strengthen workflow_clarity toward the 5 anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and assumes competence with no concept padding, but the 'Default stance' (16 bullets) and 'Red lines' (12 bullets) sections overlap materially with the Workflow and could be tightened. Above the 3 anchor (some unnecessary content) but not lean enough for 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance for an instruction-only skill: exact output template, stable ID scheme (R1-M1), claim/evidence pointer rules, and named axes. Falls short of 5 only because no filled worked example of a concern block is provided. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequence with validation gates (freeze reports in step 6 before comparison in step 7, QA pass in step 9). Above the 3 anchor (validation present) but the error-recovery feedback loop is lighter than the explicit validate->fix->retry pattern of the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview body with bulk detail delegated to nine real reference files via a 'Related files' table carrying 'Open when' triggers; references are one level deep, well-signaled, and all verified to exist, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |