Simulate Nature-style or general pre-submission peer review from the referee perspective, not an author rebuttal. Use for reviewer reports, mock peer review, manuscript critique, novelty/significance/technical-soundness assessment, 审稿人视角评估, 模拟审稿, 预审, 投稿前自审, 审稿意见模拟, or 帮我审一下论文. Produce evidence-grounded Major Concerns, Minor Comments, and blocking flags. For multiple reviewers, keep every reviewer mutually blind in a separate context, freeze all reports before comparison, and create any synthesis only afterward as a separate editor/author-facing artifact.
70
86%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Scanned
3817cd1
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.