nature-writing

Draft, restructure, or plan Nature-style manuscript sections and initial-submission materials from author-provided claims, results, figures, notes, or Chinese drafts. Use for abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, Results or experiments, discussions, conclusions, titles, full manuscript arguments, and first-submission packages such as cover letters, title pages, highlights, author contributions, availability or declaration text, and reviewer suggestions. Also use to classify Results evidence, decide what belongs in main text, captions, Methods or source data, or Supplementary Information, compress Results to the shortest sufficient evidence chain, prevent revision accretion, and audit paragraph necessity or claim repetition. Trigger on drafting a paper or section, structuring a manuscript, academic writing, first submission, 投稿材料、首次投稿、投稿信、标题页、亮点、作者贡献、数据可用性声明、推荐审稿人.

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-architected router that keeps context cheap by loading fragments on demand via a clear five-step protocol with a correction checkpoint and a missing-input feedback loop. It is concise and highly actionable for routing, with minor trimming opportunities in explanatory asides.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The router is lean and assumes Claude's competence, loading detailed fragments on demand rather than inlining them; a few explanatory asides ('They were initially distilled from published NMI papers...') could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Gives concrete, executable routing instructions (read manifest, detect axes, load specific files, apply a prioritized order) with real file paths; falls short of 5 only because actual drafting moves live in deferred fragments rather than copy-paste-ready examples inline.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear five-step routing protocol with explicit sequencing, a stated-axes checkpoint for user correction, and a missing-input feedback loop (placeholder + 'Assumptions or missing inputs' instead of inventing content).	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Exemplary one-level-deep structure: a short router pointing to a manifest, a static/ fragment layer, and a references/ table loaded on demand; on-demand triggers are explicitly enumerated and the referenced files exist under references/.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A dense, specific description that clearly states capabilities and trigger conditions with concrete deliverable names and bilingual triggers. It answers both 'what' and 'when' explicitly and carves a distinct initial-submission niche, with only minor overlap risk from generic 'academic writing' phrasing.

Suggestions

Tighten the 'academic writing' trigger so it scopes to Nature-style manuscripts specifically, reducing overlap with generic writing or revision skills.

The sentence is very long; consider trimming the enumerated method/classification clauses to keep the most discriminating triggers without losing coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions (draft, restructure, plan, classify Results evidence, compress evidence chains, audit paragraph necessity) across a comprehensive range of manuscript sections and submission materials.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers 'what' (draft/structure/plan Nature-style sections and first-submission materials) and 'when' (a concrete 'Trigger on ...' clause listing natural trigger terms), satisfying both halves.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Covers natural English trigger phrases ('drafting a paper', 'academic writing', 'first submission', 'cover letter') plus Chinese equivalents (投稿材料、首次投稿、投稿信) and specific deliverable names users would say.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The Nature-style manuscript + initial-submission niche is distinct and bounded by an explicit submission boundary, but the broad academic-writing trigger terms carry minor overlap risk with general writing or revision skills.	4 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
relative_links	Relative link issues: 1 missing	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 1 deeper-than-1-level	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Path: skills/nature-writing/SKILL.md
Commit: 3817cd1

Reviewed: about 9 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.