Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable interview framework: concrete questions, comprehensive decision-heuristic mapping tables, a copy-paste generation template, and an explicit validation checklist with feedback loops. It is dense rather than padded, with clearly signaled external references, though some inline reference tables could arguably be split out.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense with compact mapping tables and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, though the total length is significant, fitting the efficient-but-not-maximally-lean score-4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete interview questions, user-says-to-config mapping tables, a copy-paste generation template skeleton, and an exact confirmation format provide fully executable guidance covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight phases are explicitly sequenced with a gating rule ("Move to the next phase only after the current phase is clear"), capped by a confirmation checkpoint and a 15-item Validation Checklist with a fix-and-retry loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A dedicated "References (load only when needed)" section signals one-level-deep references with dual in-repo and HTTPS paths; the large inline mapping tables are runtime decision logic so inline placement is defensible, leaving minor organization gaps versus the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |