Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clear, actionable router with an explicit sequence and concrete file targets per task type. Its main weakness is the redundant ~50-file flat list that hurts conciseness and organization.
Suggestions
Remove or collapse the flat ~50-file list (lines 14-63) since the curated task->file mapping already covers the needed references, or move it to a separate appendix section.
Add a brief heading or grouping (e.g., '## Available workflow prompts') to clearly signal the reference list rather than dropping it after a stray line.
Reconcile the 'Read only the files you need' instruction with the wholesale file dump so the guidance and the listing do not contradict each other.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The prose and task->file mapping are lean, but the inline flat list of ~50 file paths (lines 14-63) duplicates the curated mapping and adds token cost with little marginal value, so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Each task type maps to a concrete, copy-paste-ready file path (e.g., 'Create new workflows: `.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md`'), giving fully actionable routing guidance for a dispatcher skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The single dispatcher flow is explicitly sequenced (identify task type -> load matching file -> follow it) with a clarifying-question fallback; for a simple router with no destructive/batch steps this unambiguous sequence earns the top score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are one level deep and directly named, but the ~50-file flat wall is poorly organized inline content that should be a separate appendix, and no local bundle exists to structure against, keeping it below the cleanly-split anchor 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |