CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agentic-workflows

Route gh-aw workflow design/create/debug/upgrade requests to the right prompts.

56

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.github/skills/agentic-workflows/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an efficient, actionable dispatcher with a clear routing workflow and one-level-deep file references. Its main weakness is the flat 49-file dump, which could be grouped for better navigation.

Suggestions

Group the 49-file list into categories (e.g., create/update, debug/upgrade, syntax, safe-outputs) so the relevant file is easier to find instead of scanning a flat dump.

Add a brief explicit validation/checkpoint step (e.g., 'Confirm the loaded prompt matches the task before proceeding') to strengthen the routing workflow.

Consider trimming the full file dump and relying on the routing bullets, which already name the most-used prompt files.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with a short intro and bulleted routing, but the large flat dump of 49 file paths overlaps with the routing bullets that already name the relevant files, a minor trim opportunity.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete task-type-to-file mappings give clear, executable pointers to the right prompt files, though there is no code or command for an instruction-only router, leaving a minor gap.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence (identify task type, load matching file, follow it, ask if unclear) is clear and well-suited to a simple dispatcher, with a light clarifying-question checkpoint and no destructive ops triggering the cap.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

References are one level deep and clearly signaled as file paths, but the long undifferentiated flat list of 49 files is a minor organization gap rather than grouped navigation.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description concisely states the skill's purpose as a router for gh-aw workflow tasks but lacks an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause, capping completeness. Trigger terms are reasonable but could include more natural synonyms.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming the user-facing situations that should trigger this skill (e.g., 'Use when a user asks to design, create, update, debug, or upgrade GitHub Agentic Workflows').

Include more natural synonyms or recognizable terms (e.g., 'GitHub Actions workflows', '.github/workflows') so users say the trigger phrases naturally.

Consider stating the concrete capability beyond routing (e.g., that it dispatches to dedicated design/create/debug prompts) to raise specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the gh-aw workflow domain and a concrete routing action plus several task verbs (design/create/debug/upgrade), but describes a single dispatch action rather than comprehensive capabilities, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' (route requests to prompts) is clear, but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user verbs like design, create, debug, and upgrade, but leans on the jargony 'gh-aw' term and omits common synonyms or file-type triggers, fitting between anchors 3 and 4.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The gh-aw workflow niche with specific task verbs is mostly distinct from other skills, with only minor overlap risk against generic workflow or CI skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Z3Prover/z3
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.