Conciseness

The body is dense and imperative with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the "Runtime Reads" file list is duplicated in the "Runtime and Setup" paragraph, and the disjointed §2/§3/§5 section numbering adds minor overhead. Efficient with a few trimmable instances, fitting the level-4 anchor rather than the lean level-5 anchor.

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance dominates: named veto codes (ROAS-R1/R2/O1/O2/A1), exact env resolution `AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel ...)}"`, a named validator `validate-audit-artifact.py` with `--relative-path`, and a concrete persistence path pattern. Minor gaps remain — the actual scorer invocation and the "typed conversation header" are delegated to external runbook files rather than shown — matching level 4, not the fully copy-paste-ready level 5.

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced workflow (declare context → normalize → score all 20 items → verify vetoes → run typed scorer → report → validated persistence) with explicit validation checkpoints, error-recovery branches (`NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED`, fail-closed `NOT_SCORED` when the scorer is unavailable), and a validate → persist → revalidate feedback loop. This matches the level-5 anchor including feedback loops and checklists.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview pointing to one-level-deep, clearly signaled references, and the bundled `references/auditor-runtime.md` exists and is relevant. It falls short of level 5 because the runtime-reads list is stated twice, and most referenced files (`../../../references/auditor-runbook.md`, `scoring-semantics.md`, `roas-benchmark.md`, etc.) live outside the skill bundle, so navigation depends on the surrounding repo layout — minor organization gaps per the level-4 anchor.

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — "auditing a paid ad account for incremental contribution, wasted spend, or measurement integrity" and "runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile with verified vetoes and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED gate on own exported data" — covering inputs, scoring behavior, and output gate comprehensively. It exceeds the level-4 anchor, which expects minor coverage gaps.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both: what ("runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile with verified vetoes and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED gate") and when ("Use when auditing a paid ad account ... before scaling"), with concrete trigger conditions and explicit negative triggers. Matches the level-5 anchor exactly.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases like "auditing a paid ad account", "wasted spend", "ROAS", and "before scaling" are present, but common variations users might say (e.g., "Google Ads", "Facebook/Meta ads", "performance marketing", "paid media") are missing. Good coverage without synonym breadth, fitting the level-4 anchor rather than 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche with explicit boundaries — "Not for campaign structure design — use campaign-architect; not for creative production — use ad-creative-builder" — minimizing conflict risk with sibling marketing skills. Distinct triggers (audit/ROAS/measurement integrity) match the level-5 anchor.